For the same reason as Bernd's, and having seen interest from outside
the James community to the Mailet Api (which is a great thing),
I change my "vote" from -1 to +1.
It's nice to be able to change our minds sometimes, isn't it? :-)
Vincenzo
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
Danny Angus wrote:
Hi,
Just for clarification, please could we agree on the status of the
mailet-api@ list.
The list is for development of the mailet api, changes to the api are
discussed and decisions and votes on the api are take on
[email protected]
[ ] +1
[ ] 0
[ ] -1
+0
In the light of current activities I change my vote to
+1, keep the list for development activities
reason: people from other mail server projects may feel better to
discuss on a dedicated list without all the James Server noise around.
It shows more openess and emphasizes the stand-alone nature of the
Mailet API.
Bernd
