On Nov 8, 2007 9:02 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jason Hunter ha scritto: > > Some of you may have seen my announcement this morning on community@ > > about MarkMail, a new email archiving service. > > [...] > > Apache James lives at the heart of the email ingestion pipeline, and I > > wanted to write in here to say thanks to the people who built such a > > useful tool. Having a Java-based extensible mail processor really > > simplified my life. If you see me at ApacheCon, let me know: I've got a > > T-shirt for you. > > [...] > > Cool! Thank you for sharing your experience!
+1 (for those who don't know, jason is one of the greats from the last days of [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the earliest days of jakarta so it's especially cool to find out what he's been working on) been meaning to blog about markmail since this concept is one of my long term email itches - great to see a working implementation :-) any chance of adding searchable archives for some of the email specification lists? (apache is a rank 9 site but most of the email specification archives seem to be buried on low ranked sites and are effectively invisible to conventional search engines) > > I do have a lingering question whose answer I couldn't find in the archive: > > > > * Is there any way to easily employ multiple match conditions > > (subject is X, sender contains Y) without setting up extra processors? > > No, unfortunately there's no way. Programmatically it would be easy to > support something similar, but it's hard to find out an easy xml > configuration to define complex expressions, so we never added this feature. a rules engine supporting xml would probably do the job. drools seems particularly popular right now but most JSR-94 implementation would probably do the job. i suspect that the work invovled wouldn't be great. anyone fancy taking this one on? - robert
