On 09/11/2007, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> drools seems particularly popular right now but most JSR-94 implementation 
> would
> probably do the job. i suspect that the work invovled wouldn't be
> great. anyone fancy taking this one on?

Drools was exactly my first thought, its a wonder that we hadn't
thought of it before.
I'll raise an issue in JIRA so we don't forget. Hopefully I'll be able
to do the job too.

d.

Reply via email to