Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
i think that we should separate the mailet code from the server
codebase in trunk. i can see two easy initial products:
i'm tempted to move quickly to a VOTE since there seems to be a rough
consensus but i'll post this first just in case anyone wants to jump
in with objections, ask for clarifications or come up with improved
names. so now's your chance ;-)
- robert
name: standard-mailets
contents: mailets and mailet utilities decoupled from JAMES server
(see stefano's analysis)
rationale: mailets should be reusable outside JAMES. separating them
from JAMES server is an architectural improvement and means users can
take mailets without having to take the rest of JAMES
name: security-mailets
contents: SMIME, PGP/MIME, security utilities
rationale: security is a specialist area with specific dependencies.
easier to version and release independently.
+1, thanks for starting this.
Bernd
