Danny Angus ha scritto:
On Feb 4, 2008 9:58 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are you referring to the repositories api and the mailet v3 sandbox?
Indirectly. I'm *not* proposing making big API changes, but moving
James interfaces to mailet would let us do 99% of moving mailets out.
I'm not sure Robert proposal is related to it.... Robert?
I don;t see how we can move out mailets without doing that.
d.
In server-dev yesterday I wrote a big message about mailets with no
dependencies on james server and mailets with minor utility dependencies
(for which we could move the utility too) and mailets that requires a
small refactoring to be able to move them out.
It is a first step, and we will remain only james server specific
mailets in james-server, so it will be easier to understand what
interfaces we should place in the mailet api to move some or all of them
to the standard mailet product.
We are not happy with repository interfaces in james-server now (at
least this is my understanding), so I'm not sure that moving them to a
public api (mailet api) will be a good thing. Furthermore any change
like this should be discussed in the mailet-api list as we are not the
only implementors of the mailet-apis.
Stefano
