On 3/28/07, Dan Bron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Though, in retrospect, since Terrence is new to J (I assume),

new for a second time. I keep wondering about it. It's easier to get
into than kX and kdb. It's more readable than APL. It's more terse
than haskell (I always start losing in Haskell when it gets to
monads).

I do a lot of data crunching: I take csv, xml, fixed-width files and
commit such data to SQL databases. And sometimes spreadsheets. So, I'm
just playing with J to see what it can offer a
Perl/Python/soon-to-be-Java guy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to