On 6/23/07, Terrence Brannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, chapter 2 is up -
http://hg.metaperl.com/j?f=25ffccb8b896;file=doc/book-notes/learning-j/2.txt;style=raw
I see some ambiguities there, probably the worst is
Now that we know what items are, give a precise definition of the
verbs "," and "+/"
If I were taking this test, I would waste some time wondering if you
meant
[1] Describe the monads , and +/ in terms of the items of their arguments.
[2] ditto but for the dyads
[3] ditto for both dyads and monads
[4] something else?
then I guess I would go for 3 (since it seems the most comprehensive),
but I'd still worry.
--
Raul
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
