On 6/23/07, Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/23/07, Terrence Brannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, chapter 2 is up -
>
>
http://hg.metaperl.com/j?f=25ffccb8b896;file=doc/book-notes/learning-j/2.txt;style=raw
I see some ambiguities there, probably the worst is
Now that we know what items are, give a precise definition of the
verbs "," and "+/"
http://www.jsoftware.com/help/learning/02.htm has in section 2.5.2 -
Now we can say that in general (x , y) is a list consisting of the
items of x followed by the items of y.
Now we can say that in general +/ inserts + between items of an array.
... so I was shooting for an explanation of , and +/ in terms of items
just like above.
If I were taking this test, I would waste some time wondering if you
meant
[1] Describe the monads , and +/ in terms of the items of their arguments.
[2] ditto but for the dyads
Oh, that's a good point I never thought of the fact that , has both
monadic and dyadic cases..
Now I know how Henry Rich felt when I was complaining about "J for C
Programmers" :)
--
J IRC Channel irc://irc.freenode.org/jsoftware
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
