On 7/7/07, bill lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Raul Miller wrote:
> Last I heard, C was a popular language for open-source development.
> I'm aware of some proprietary standards for the language (for example,
> C99), but not any "open standards".  Can you point me at any?

Isn't C99, like FORTRAN-77, an ISO standard?

Yes, it's an ISO standard.

However, as such, it's less "open" as a standard than J.

Perhaps "proprietary" is too strong a word for standards which
are published openly but which are closed to derivatives.  But
I do not see that the C language, as a standard, is more open
than the J language.

--
Raul
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to