On 7/7/07, Terrence Brannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/7/07, Devon McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think Roger has always taken the stance that the dictionary offers a
> complete specification of the language, hence it is, in this sense, open.
unfortunately, this sense is not good enough for the
http://pleac.sf.net people -
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=m27ipl6ytc.fsf%40bluewin.ch
i started implementing the examples and was told that J was not open
and free enough to have its examples accepted.
I do not see any obvious statements of what they will or will not accept.
Why do you think that J's dictionary is the issue?
--
Raul
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
