That's true. But I don't have any trouble with the current names for i: . It's not unusual for a concept being extended but the name for the concept not including the extension. It just seems to me that the names for primitives listed in the vocabulary should be the same as the names in ~system\packages\misc\primitiv.ijs . [ and ] are both called "same" in the vocabulary but monadic [ is called "right" in primitiv.ijs .
On 9/20/07, Roger Hui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > i: 3.14j5 > _3.14 _1.884 _0.628 0.628 1.884 3.14 > > No integers in the whole lot. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Don Guinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thursday, September 20, 2007 10:22 > Subject: Re: [Jgeneral] i. and i: have the same informal name. I think > this should be changed > To: General forum <[email protected]> > > > >From ~system\packages\misc\primitiv.ijs > > > > i. IndexOf Integers > > i: IndexOfLast IntegerRange > > > > Names are unique here, just not the names used in the > > Dictionary. Maybe just > > update the Dictionary to use these names. > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
