On Dec 21, 2007 12:47 PM, Dan Bron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/general/2006-January/026271.html > he says: > With the hindsight from 17 years of usage, I would > define 2-verb trains differently, viz. > (f g) y <-> f g y > x (f g) y <-> f (x g y) > And the ranks would be _ _ _ ... > I would not support this change, because I like > and use hooks.
What if we had a hook conjunction? Would that not make hooks clearer and easier to recognize than currently? -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
