> From: Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > (f v g vv h)Y > > ((f Y) v ((g Y) vv (h Y))) > > Do you mean that Y is a verb, and you have so many instances > of (f v g w h) Y that you would not want to replace (f v g w h) Y > with > (f v g w h) H: Y > (where H: represents a hypothetical hook conjunction).? Change: ‘Y is a verb’ by ‘Y is a noun’ and ‘H: represents a hypothetical hook conjunction’ by ‘H: represents a hypothetical adverb’ (where the train f … h is, in general, an unbroken train of forks)
> > If so, remember that pretty much everyone in this discussion agrees > that backwards compatability issues mean that J will not ever change > its current handling of bidents. At any rate; I am conscious that "Deux in machina" has been very clear about it for quite some time. > > However, if that is not what you meant, I do not understand your > point. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
