On 1/2/08, Jose Mario Quintana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > (f v g vv h)Y > > > ((f Y) v ((g Y) vv (h Y))) > ... 'Y is a noun' and > ... 'H: represents a hypothetical adverb'
Ok, I think I now understand: You are talking about the hypothetical replacement trident processing, and not about the hypothetical replacement of bident processing. In retrospect, this should have been obvious. And, I think I agree: while we could have fork without trident support, trident support for fork seems just too nice to go without. Thanks, -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
