That is disconcerting. I have used 13 : quite a bit to produce tacits and always assumed that the translation was correct. By the way is the original expression or the tacit equivalent more efficient. I assume the former but somewhere along the line have heard that the tacit is more efficient.
cheers Roelof Dr. Roelof K. Brouwer PEng PhD http://www.tru.ca/faculty/rbrouwer Professor Emeritus School of Advanced Technologies and Mathematics Thompson Rivers University 900 McGill Road, PO Box 3010 Kamloops, BC, Canada,V2C 5N3 1 250 374 5874 home 1 250 828 5219 work 1 250 377 6133 fax email [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Donovan Sent: February 28, 2008 1:58 AM To: General forum Subject: RE: [Jgeneral] FW: surprised > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Jgeneral] FW: surprised > Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:51:48 -0800 > > I started with an expression 13 : that did not work as it should > And just replaced the 13 with a 3 which worked. I used the 13 to see what > the tacit equivalent would look like. Does the 13 have a different effect to > what I thought it did? > I reported a bug in 13 : some time ago, with no response. I don't have the latedt release installed yet so don't know if it's yet been corrected: v1=: 3 : 'y + y' v2=:13 : 'y + y' v1 3 6 v2 3 3 v1 3 : 'y + y' v2 + _________________________________________________________________ Share what Santa brought you https://www.mycooluncool.com------------------------------------------------ ---------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
