"Indices less their products" --- Oleg Kobchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like the idea of dyad -. but to me a more readable > (or, conversely, expressive) would be > > (-. [:,*/~)@(2+i.) > > Relation of -. adics > > 1 2 3 4 -. 2 4 6 > 1 3 > 1 2 3 4 ([ #~ [EMAIL PROTECTED]) 2 4 6 > 1 3 > > > > --- Henry Rich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > -.~/@(|. */ >:)@:>:@:i. > > > > Henry Rich > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Randall > > > Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 5:44 PM > > > To: General forum > > > Subject: Re: [Jgeneral] How readable is J? > > > > > > > Dan Bron wrote: > > > > (#~ ] -.@:e. [: , */~)@:(2 + i.) > > > > > > If the goal were readability, I would write > > > > > > (#~ (-.@:e. ,@:(*/~)))@:(2 + i.) > > > > > > This consistently uses f@:g rather than mixing in [: f g, and clearly > > > displays two hooks, one of which (#~ f) is a standard idiom. I am > > > also not clear on the merits of ] f g . > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster > Total Access, No Cost. > > http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ____________________________________________________________________________________ You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost. http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
