> Dan Bron wrote: > (#~ ] -.@:e. [: , */~)@:(2 + i.) If the goal were readability, I would write
(#~ (-.@:e. ,@:(*/~)))@:(2 + i.) This consistently uses f@:g rather than mixing in [: f g, and clearly displays two hooks, one of which (#~ f) is a standard idiom. I am also not clear on the merits of ] f g . Best wishes, John ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
