---Sherlock, Ric wrote: > ---Oleg Kobchenko wrote: > > In dictionary page, I think replacing the top two tables > > (for title and monad/dyad) with DIVs makes it worse in > > a number of ways [snip] > > Ignoring the DIVs vs tables issue for now ... > I think it would be an improvement if it were clear, from the > structural markup of the dictionary pages, that the monadic > name, definition (and rank?) are linked and "belong > together". Ditto for the dyadic name, definition and rank. > Using the current markup structure, the names and the > definitions are separated in different tables and there is no > indication of their link. >
Here is a possible layout of a dictionary Vocab page using one table instead of DIVs to layout the monadic/dyadic definitions, while attempting to structurally maintain the logical link between the names, ranks and definitions. http://www.massey.ac.nz/~rsherloc/jdict/egpage2a.html (d200.htm) Compare with http://www.jsoftware.com/help/dictionary/d200.htm (original) And http://www.massey.ac.nz/~rsherloc/jdict/egpage2.html (using DIVs) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
