On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Ian Clark <[email protected]> wrote: ... > > There is always the option to retain a (frozen) j602 installation to > run old utilities, but there is a downside to doing that. I'd much > rather move whole and entire to j701 without delay -- and discard my > j602. Even a macroprocessor to convert J scripts would be a boon, even > if it copped-out at difficult bits and left me to migrate them by > hand. 2 or 3 lines in my whole user library, I don't doubt.
What is the downside of retaining J602 for systems written using it? I still have J5 systems that I never updated. Several versions of J can coexist. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
