base was updated
On 1/11/2012 10:44 AM, bill lam wrote:
> Either update the base library will solve the problem.
>
> This issue had already been discussed in J forum if I remember correctly.
>
> Срд, 11 Янв 2012, Cliff Reiter писал(а):
>> Here is the problems encountered trying to install image 3 on J6:
>>
>> Fresh J6 32 install, up to date base and image3; loading image3.ijs fails
>> with a control error
>>
>> 3 : 0''
>> if. IF64 +. IFUNIX +: IFWIN do.
>> if. IFJ6 do.
>> wd 'mb "" "Unsupported Platform" '
>> else.
>> sminfo '';'Unsupported Platform'
>> end.
>> end.
>> ''
>> )
>> |control error: scriptd
>> | 3 :0''
>> |[-45] C:\Users\user\j602\addons\media\image3\image3.ijs
>>
>>
>> Commenting out the control in question
>> NB. display error if not 32-bit linux/PC
>> NB. 3 : 0''
>> NB. if. IF64 +. IFUNIX +: IFWIN do.
>> NB. if. IFJ6 do.
>> NB. wd 'mb "" "Unsupported Platform" '
>> NB. else.
>> NB. sminfo '';'Unsupported Platform'
>> NB. end.
>> NB. end.
>> NB. ''
>> NB. )
>>
>> NB. System directory separator
>> dir_sep=: IFJ6{::'/';system{'/\' NB. directory separator
>> |value error: IFJ6
>> | dir_sep=: IFJ6{::'/';system{'/\'
>> |[-48] C:\Users\user\j602\addons\media\image3\image3.ijs
>>
>> leads to value error
>>
>> replacing the offending line with
>> dir_sep=: system{'/\'
>>
>> makes the addons work (but same issues in movie script)
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1/11/2012 9:53 AM, David Mitchell wrote:
>>> Cliff,
>>> From what I see, the base image3.ijs, with very minor changes, should
>>> work in
>>> either J7_32 or J6_32. I was able to get html_gallery8.ijs to also work
>>> fine in
>>> J7 with minor changes. view_m.ijs and prevare.ijs are wd (J6) specific.
>>>
>>> I've gotten all of the image3 lab, with the exception of prevare, working
>>> in JHS.
>>>
>>> The image3html lab also works fine in JHS, with the exception of the last
>>> demo
>>> of prevare.
>>>
>>> It looks like image3movie will take one minor change to work in JHS.
>>>
>>> Prevare and view_m are wd apps and will only work in J6.
>>>
>>> It is always a debate about how much to have version-specific copies of
>>> code vs.
>>> having the code adapt to various versions.
>>>
>>> I think most of image3 is very close to working in J6 wd and J7 JHS. To
>>> me, it
>>> would make sense to have unique, version specific scripts for prevare and
>>> view_m
>>> and keep the remaining scripts as single scripts. Since the install
>>> process for
>>> J7 labs is different than J6, it probably make sense to have J7 specific
>>> labs.
>>>
>>> What issue are you seeing with the J6 install?
>>>
>>> All the best/David
>>>
>>> On 1/11/2012 9:20, Cliff Reiter wrote:
>>>> David (et al),
>>>> Does it make sense to change the image3 addon into a J6 only addon and
>>>> then create a duplicate image3_j7 to which you can add the updated labs
>>>> and eventually add other contributions/updates? I would like to repair
>>>> the J6 install problem but don't want to inhibit J7 progress.
>>>> Best, Cliff
>>>>
>>>> On 1/10/2012 9:15 AM, David Mitchell wrote:
>>>>> Hi Cliff,
>>>>>
>>>>> I was able to get much of the Image3 addon and Lab working on J701 32
>>>>> bit. I
>>>>> just copied the image3 addon directory to the j701 addons. I also copied
>>>>> image3.ijt to addons/labs/labs/graphics.
>>>>>
>>>>> I changed the lab to use JHS inline graphics display. The sections for
>>>>> 'gallery' and 'prevare' need to be updated also, but I thought you might
>>>>> like to
>>>>> see what I have so far.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/Image3LabJ701
>>>>>
>>>>> All the best,
>>>>> David
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1/9/2012 13:04, Cliff Reiter wrote:
>>>>>> Howdy,
>>>>>> This week I am working with a student to see what can be done about
>>>>>> moving image3& fvj3 to more platforms. I discovered that the current
>>>>>> image3 does not install any longer on J32 win. I thought this was fixed
>>>>>> months ago. It looks like someone really likes having error messages on
>>>>>> 64 bit, which are not supported, at the expense of 32bit, which is
>>>>>> supported, not working. Sigh.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That aside, this is all pretty much a mess in J7 so I would really
>>>>>> appreciate any wisdom from the web. Does it make sense try to overlay
>>>>>> image3 on platimg? How feasible is it for platimg to move to 64 bit? How
>>>>>> well does platimg work in J7?
>>>>>> Best, Cliff
>>>>>>
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>>
>> --
>> Clifford A. Reiter
>> Lafayette College, Easton, PA 18042
>> http://webbox.lafayette.edu/~reiterc/
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
--
Clifford A. Reiter
Lafayette College, Easton, PA 18042
http://webbox.lafayette.edu/~reiterc/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
