R. Quenett wrote:
Honestly, I don't know what to think. What do you think?
I think the probability of this being true is very low (but not zero).
If only for the reason that whatever twisted objective was being served
could likely have been accomplished by something far less complicated
and risky.
Such "conspiracy theories" are generally dismissed. Even though history
shows us that conspiracies do happen and might even be said to be common.
To draw a parallel, I don't believe for a moment that Vince Foster
committed suicide. But I believe that for two reasons: a) some smart
people close to the incident seem also to believe it, and b) because I'm
likely to believe anything negative about the Clintons and would claim
to have good reason to do so. I suspect the 9/11 theories go much the same.
One thing is certain, we will *never* know the truth, barring some
unimaginable cosmic accident. As the powers on all sides are better
served by hiding the truth - even if it would hurt their enemies.
Rule #1: The government always lies.
(Sometimes in minor ways and insignificant spinning. But there will
never be a case where they tell the unencumbered truth. This rule BTW is
unaffected by the outcome of any election.)
Note that Martha Stewart went to jail for telling lies of less
consequence than almost all of our politicians tell anytime there is a
microphone near.
Michael
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
Unsub/Pause/Etc : http://mail.linux-sxs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
