Ok, so for documentation we would compile a users guide for installation, setup, and day-to-day stuff. Then the wiki would be based towards all other information. Then the pages could be compiled into a downloadable PDF.
Phillip Smith wrote: > 2009/12/24 Markus M. May <mmay at javafreedom.org>: > >> Well, I think, that in pretty much all open source projects, the wiki is >> some kind of common knowledge management / documentation system. from my >> perspective, I am unsure, what kind of information we should provide there, >> which not "all" users can provide in the wiki. I don't really see the >> benefit here :-( >> > > I'm thinking kind of along the lines of the FreeBSD handbook vs. > FreeBSD wiki.... > _______________________________________________ > ArchServer Project General Mail List > Post messages to: general at lists.archserver.org > Administer your subscription: http://lists.archserver.org/listinfo/general > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.archserver.org/pipermail/general/attachments/20091223/d0cd6d97/attachment.html>
