2009/12/24 Daniel Moree <dmoree at shadowbranch.com>:
> Ok, so for documentation we would compile a users guide for installation,
> setup, and day-to-day stuff. Then the wiki would be based towards all other
> information. Then the pages could be compiled into a downloadable PDF.

That's it :)

The wiki I see being for general user contribution, especially for
tasks and actions that not all users will need to perform or care
about, while the documentation will be for things *all* users need to
or should do (such as Installation, basic security, etc). The
ArchServer equivalent of the Arch Linux beginners guide, provided as
"official" and multi-page like the FreeBSD handbook.

These are just my thoughts remember, I'm open to everyone else's input
of course :)

Reply via email to