2009/12/24 Daniel Moree <dmoree at shadowbranch.com>: > Ok, so for documentation we would compile a users guide for installation, > setup, and day-to-day stuff. Then the wiki would be based towards all other > information. Then the pages could be compiled into a downloadable PDF.
That's it :) The wiki I see being for general user contribution, especially for tasks and actions that not all users will need to perform or care about, while the documentation will be for things *all* users need to or should do (such as Installation, basic security, etc). The ArchServer equivalent of the Arch Linux beginners guide, provided as "official" and multi-page like the FreeBSD handbook. These are just my thoughts remember, I'm open to everyone else's input of course :)

