Rick, I still think this is unecessary copy-paste code duplication, just so the report says SDP instead of TCP. Part of the advantage of libsdp.so is you can use SDP w/o having to recode your application.
Do you really want to maintain duplicate code for all the TCP_STREAM-vs-SDP_STREAM, etc. tests? Yuck! Scott Weitzenkamp SQA and Release Manager Server Virtualization Business Unit Cisco Systems > -----Original Message----- > From: Rick Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 2:23 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen); Roland Dreier (rdreier) > Subject: initial set of "direct" SDP tests in netperf > > > I guess that until it is resolved I'll just kludge around > it with my own > > define. > > Soo, I did a bunch of cut and paste in netperf, where I take what > getaddrinfo() returns and replace the ->ai_family with > AF_INET_SDP and > set the ->ai_protocol to 0 (a guess since there isn't much in > the way of > docs on the subject I could find). > > I have implemented the SDP_STREAM, SDP_MAERTS and SDP_RR > tests thusfar, > they are enabled via a configure option of --enable-sdp . > You can grab > the bits from the top of trunk of the netperf2 repository at: > > http://www.netperf.org/svn/netperf2/trunk/ > > I've done some initial, cursory testing with the bits that ship with > RHEL5 IA64 - I seem to have some sort of overlapping problem > still even > using the install.sh that purports to remove previous bits - and I've > tried the rpm -e command roland (?) posted a few days ago - > it says that > none of those things are installed. I tried to modprobe ib_sdp (some > additional guesswork) and got symbol version mismatches. Still, even > with OFED 1.2rc2 removed there are ib_mumble modules loaded by RHEL5, > and .ko's in the standard (?) modules place. So clearly I have some > remaining clueless noob issues wrt proper installation of 1.2 bits :( > > happy benchmarking, > > rick jones > > BTW, speaking of cluelessness - you will probably have an > initial make > failure involving netperf_version.h - I've got something > still slightly > botched there I've not been able to figure-out just yet (make and > autotools aren't exactly my forte). You can work around that > by cd'ing > to src/ and doing a "make netperf-version.h" and then go back > up and to > themake again. > > PPS - the only remaining TCP tests of note I could bring-over > would be: > > TCP_SENDFILE - can one use sendfile() against an SDP socket? > TCP_CRR - like TCP_RR but includes time to call connect() > TCP_CC - like TCP_CRR, but without the RR :) > > feedback on which of those, if any, would be of interest > would be most > welcome. > > After that I suppose RDS would be next on the list? Is that > "real" at > this point? Pointers on programming to it would be welcome. > _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
