>> I have the following files in backport/2.6.9_UX/include/src/: >> >> attribute_container.c - almost identical to the file on 2.6.20. I had to >> change one line in it. >> > > could be a patch ... > which line? > > Now, attribute_container.c, klist.c & transport_class.c are copied from the kernel tree. I've committed the required changes in ~erezz/ofabuild_iser_rh4.git & ~erezz/ofed_1_2_iser_rh4.git. The main change is a new dir called "kernel_addons_patches". It contains patches for kernel tree files in order to create the required addons from them.
The rest of the files that I added to include/src are very small. I hope it's ok now. >> init.c - only a small part of the original file in 2.6.20 >> >> klist.c - almost identical to the file on 2.6.20. I had to change one line >> in it. >> > > which line? > See above. > >> kref_new.c - based on kref.c >> > > Sounds scary ... how different is it? > This file was removed. > >> scsi.c - only a small part of the original file in 2.6.20 >> >> scsi_lib.c - only a small part of the original file in 2.6.20 >> >> scsi_scan.c - only a small part of the original file in 2.6.20 >> >> transport_class.c - identical to 2.6.20 >> >> So, the only file identical to 2.6.20 is transport_class.c. We can copy it >> from 2.6.20, but since it's only a single file, I'm not sure if it will make >> a real difference. >> > > transport_class.c, attribute_container.c and klist.c are quite big together: > more than 1000 lines. So by all means, let's check them out from kernel tree. > Done. Erez _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
