On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 06:36, Devesh Sharma wrote: > On 5/31/07, Sean Hefty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Ok, Soon I will post a patch related to this. > > >How static PR file will be generated? Needs to be discussed. > > > > Please look at my latest changes to the local SA in when generating the > > patches. > > > > git://git.openfabrics.org/~shefty/rdma-dev.git sa_cache > > > Do you have some pointer/doc related to the design of current SA_CACHE > module....It will make things faster to understand........if not then > I will require your support to understand the things, Though I have > some top level view. > Thanks > > I'm not sure about the best way to communicate PRs to the cache. I haven't > > given it more than about 2 minutes of thought, but as an idea, we could > > look at > > trying to make use of the userspace MAD interface. For example, we could > > send > > MADs to the local SA with the PRs to load. More details would obviously > > need to > > be worked out, but this could provide an extensible solution. > Ok you mean Its not required to create a separate device interface in > cache module as such. I think this is a good idea......Just for > confirmation...whether /dev/umad is active on each node other than SM > node?
It's not required to be but is for things that require userspace SA client access (like RDMA CM or local cache). -- Hal > > - Sean > > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > general@lists.openfabrics.org > http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general > > To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
