I find it more constructive to have a discussion based on a short host
side architecture description that covers at least QoS for IPoIB and
RDMA CM based ULPs, rather then based on series of patches.
I responded to the original RFC:
http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/2007-July/thread.html
started new threads:
http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/2007-July/038665.html
http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/2007-July/038809.html
It's up to others to provide input. I have path forward deliverables
that require actual code.
Adding a service ID to the RDMA CM, or SL/MTU/whatever to IPoIB are
minor changes. However, I'm not convinced yet that either are desirable.
- Sean
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
