Eli Cohen wrote:
Thinking it over , if I want to make the code correct as it is now (e.g.
a single cq for both tx and rx), I must require that the user supply
both tx and rx values in each invocation of ethtool and that these
values be identical. Alternatively we can say that rx dictates
configuration for both rx and tx. When we get separate tx and rx CQs
I will modify this patch to exclude tx configuration.
my vote is for having the rx dictating the configuration and excluding
the tx handling, but if you want to have it now and remove it later,
that's fine.
Or.
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
