On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 11:19 +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote: > Eli Cohen wrote: > > Thinking it over , if I want to make the code correct as it is now (e.g. > > a single cq for both tx and rx), I must require that the user supply > > both tx and rx values in each invocation of ethtool and that these > > values be identical. Alternatively we can say that rx dictates > > configuration for both rx and tx. When we get separate tx and rx CQs > > I will modify this patch to exclude tx configuration. > > > my vote is for having the rx dictating the configuration and excluding > the tx handling, but if you want to have it now and remove it later, > that's fine. > > Or. > I also favor the idea of rx dictating the configuration - that's how it is implemented currently. _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
