On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 15:26 -0500, Chuck Hartley wrote: > I direct connected the two machines instead of running them to the > switch and I get good BW numbers. What does that indicate?
Maybe you have a degraded link in your subnet. > > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Chuck Hartley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > Nope - none of those. The closest thing is osm_pr_rcv_init > right when the SM starts up. > > BTW, we have OpenSM Rev:openib-3.0.14 > > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Hal Rosenstock > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 14:47 -0500, Chuck Hartley > wrote: > > Yes, but I don't see anything in the log file tagged > with anything > > like that. Is there some other string I can search > on to locate the > > request/response messages? > > > Maybe search for osm_pr_rcv_respond ? > > > > What osm_xxx function would be sending the > request/responses? Or what > > is the message or signal called - I see various ones > starting with > > OSM_ > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Hal Rosenstock > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 13:46 -0500, Chuck > Hartley wrote: > > > Yes, we are using OpenSM and I found where > to set the -V > > switch > > > in /etc/opensm.conf. I started opensmd > service on the > > current node > > > and looked at the log file it created. I > have no idea what > > I am > > > looking at / for... there are two items > that stand out - > > PortInfo > > > dumps and SMP dumps. What is it I am > looking for or what > > can I post > > > here? > > > > > > SA PathRecord requests/responses to your end > node. > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Hal > Rosenstock > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 09:30 -0800, > Hal Rosenstock > > wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 09:23 > -0800, Arlin Davis > > wrote: > > > > > I would concentrate on the > path record > > information > > > returned > > > > > from the SA and compare > against the straight > > verbs test > > > > > configuration. > > > > > > > > > > Hal/Sean, is there an easy way > to see path > > record > > > information > > > > > from the query? > > > > > > > > Most SMs have a way to display > the PathRecord > > responses > > > being returned > > > > by the SA. Would that work ? If > OpenSM is being > > used, use -V > > > on the > > > > command line for this. Contact > your vendor if a > > vendor > > > specific SM is > > > > being used and this technique > would work for your > > purposes. > > > > > > > > > Another alternative would be to > use madeye on the > > end node but > > > I don't > > > think there's much decode there so > that would need > > to be done > > > by "hand". > > > > > > -- Hal > > > > > > > > > > > -- Hal > > > > > > > > > -arlin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > general mailing list > > > > [email protected] > > > > > http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi- > > > bin/mailman/listinfo/general > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, please visit > > > > http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > general mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi- > > bin/mailman/listinfo/general > > > > > > To unsubscribe, please visit > > > > http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
