On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 10:19 -0500, Chuck Hartley wrote: > I didn't see anything in the opensm.conf file that indicates that > OpenSM has a concept of priority. Is there some way to force it to > always be the master?
In opensm.opts, # # HANDOVER - MULTIPLE SMs OPTIONS # # SM priority used for deciding who is the master sm_priority 15 15 is the highest priority Again, it's not advisable to mix SM flavors on the same subnet. > Is there some advantage or disadvantage to running multiple copies of > OpenSM on the subnet? This provides some redundancy in the case that either the master SM or something in the node dies such that the SM is not working. > If you have multiple switches connected as we do, should some of > the default settings on opensm.conf be changed? In particular, should > REASSIGN_LIDS be set to "yes"? I wouldn't reassign LIDs unless you have a specific reason to. Changing LIDs is disruptive. -- Hal > Chuck > _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
