Hi Al, On 07:46 Sun 02 Mar , Albert Chu wrote: > > In order to make things work, I also had to add this patch. Seems like a > corner case that needs to be handled since we never fall into > __osm_pi_rcv_process_switch_port().
Hmm, it is strange. After this light sweep cycle OpenSM should continue with heavy sweep where __osm_pi_rcv_process_switch_port() should be reissued. Do you see any errors during discovery? Sasha _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
