On 07:46 Sun 02 Mar , Albert Chu wrote: > Hey Sasha, > > In order to make things work, I also had to add this patch. Seems like a > corner case that needs to be handled since we never fall into > __osm_pi_rcv_process_switch_port(). (BTW, I am working off a 3.1.10 > branch for the test cluster, so this patch is forward ported and > technically untested.) > > --- a/opensm/opensm/osm_port_info_rcv.c > +++ b/opensm/opensm/osm_port_info_rcv.c > @@ -564,6 +564,7 @@ void osm_pi_rcv_process(IN void *context, IN void *data) > ", Commencing heavy sweep\n", > cl_ntoh64(node_guid), cl_ntoh64(port_guid)); > sm->p_subn->force_heavy_sweep = 1; > + sm->p_subn->ignore_existing_lfts = 1; > goto Exit; > }
Applied. Thanks. Sasha _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
