Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
Hi Hal,
On 10:22 Tue 04 Mar , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
As I recall, the QoS manager (at OFED 1.3) is experimental. If so, in
the release notes, QoS manager should be indicated as experimental in
the release notes.
Yes, it seems correct.
Additionally, there should be some statement of what
HCAs and firmware versions this works with (and any switch firmware
dependencies if any).
Would be nice to have.
Yevgeny, could you provide such info?
I'm not aware of any switch FW dependency.
As for HCAs - I'll collect the relevant info and update
the list and the doc.
It also brings on new tools requirements for building (versions of yacc
and lex) which should also be indicated there (and perhaps checked
somehow in the build process).
Can this get added/updated to the release notes ?
The only technical problem I see with this is that 1.3 was released
already. We could update release notes in the master - better than
nothing.
We can also update the release notes in the ofed_1_3 branch,
and then it would be included in OFED 1.3.1 that will be out
at some point.
Also, it would also be nice if there were a way to not include this in
the OpenSM build if not wanted (an --enable-qos-annex configure option
or the like). Is that a straightforward change ?
Seems fine for me. And I think it was discussed already, but somehow
forgotten :( . We can keep this enabled by default.
I'll work to add a config option for this, something
like --without-qos-annex.
Will it go into ofed_1_3 ?
-- Yevgeny
Sasha
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
