On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 20:29 +0000, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
> On 08:58 Thu 06 Mar     , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> > 
> > > +typedef uint8_t mad_gid_t[16];
> > 
> > Should this be ib_mad_gid_t ?
> 
> Or maybe ibmad_gid_t - to match library name exactly?

Yes but then there would be lots of others to make consistent and follow
the standard. Would they all be converted over ? That would be the best
thing to do but is more disruptive.

-- Hal

> Sasha
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
> 
> To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

Reply via email to