On 12:29 Thu 06 Mar , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 20:29 +0000, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote: > > On 08:58 Thu 06 Mar , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > > > > > > +typedef uint8_t mad_gid_t[16]; > > > > > > Should this be ib_mad_gid_t ? > > > > Or maybe ibmad_gid_t - to match library name exactly? > > Yes but then there would be lots of others to make consistent and follow > the standard. Would they all be converted over ? That would be the best > thing to do but is more disruptive.
Yes, this would be nice. Not sure when we will do it - one-by-one moving is likely better than nothing anyway. Sasha _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
