On Sat, 2008-05-10 at 21:51 +0300, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote: > Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > Hi Yevgeny, > > > > Is it possible that OpenSM's fat tree routing somehow depends on the > > LIDs previously assigned ? > > It depends only on the existence of the LIDs. > > > It seems that for a legitimate fat tree topology, the topology sometimes > > won't come up as a fat tree if reassigning LIDs (-r) is not used. > > That's odd... > > > In addition to -r making fat tree work, certain routing algorithms seem > > to also clear this out (without using -r). For example, if lash were run > > and then ftree, it seems to work without doing the -r. (Haven't yet > > tried updn). > > > > Any ideas on this ? Should a bug be filed on this ? Thanks. > > No ideas whatsoever. Please file a bug on this.
I filed this as bug 1031: https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1031 > It would be nice if I could reproduce it in simulation. Yes, that would be nice; but I don't have a sim case. -- Hal > -- Yevgeny > > > -- Hal > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
