On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 11:35 -0600, Chris Worley wrote: > On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 10:26 -0600, Chris Worley wrote: > >> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > Chris, > >> > > >> > On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 09:52 -0600, Chris Worley wrote: > >> >> Is there any command line utility to tell nodes that don't see the > >> >> route change to "go ask the SM again for your routes"... or "clear the > >> >> route table"? > >> > > >> > I'm not sure what you're asking. There is no route table at end nodes; > >> > only switch nodes and the SM maintains these. The end node only has path > >> > records which it has retrieved and perhaps cached. Path records should > >> > be refreshed when SM or local LID changes which are local events to the > >> > end node. > >> > >> After an sm change (i.e. using the "-r" switch), > > > > That should be a local LID change. > > > >> nodes can't ping each > >> other over IPoIB (other protocols also can't communicate). > > > > Sounds like ULP issue(s) in handling this. What kernel and/or OFED > > version are you running ? > > Currently, the SM is running OFED 1.3 on an RHEL4 2.6.9-67.0.4 kernel > with Lustre 1.6.4.2 changes. > > The compute nodes are running the same kernel w/ OFED 1.2.5.5... which > will be upgraded to 1.3 by the end of the day.
Maybe that will be better for LID change; Let us know. -- Hal > > Chris > > > > -- Hal > > > >> Restarting the OFED stack works, but modules won't unload if there was > >> something active (i.e. Lustre), so the only recource to getting the > >> OFED stack working again is a hard reboot. > >> > >> That's what I'd like to avoid if possible. > >> > >> Chris > >> > > >> > -- Hal > >> > > >> >> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 5:19 AM, Sasha Khapyorsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > Hi Hal, > >> >> > > >> >> > On 04:19 Mon 12 May , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> I filed this as bug 1031: > >> >> >> https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1031 > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > It would be nice if I could reproduce it in simulation. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Yes, that would be nice; but I don't have a sim case. > >> >> > > >> >> > Do you have ibnetdiscover file for this case? If not from where report > >> >> > is coming? > >> >> > > >> >> > Sasha > >> >> > _______________________________________________ > >> >> > general mailing list > >> >> > general@lists.openfabrics.org > >> >> > http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general > >> >> > > >> >> > To unsubscribe, please visit > >> >> > http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general > >> >> > > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> general mailing list > >> >> general@lists.openfabrics.org > >> >> http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general > >> >> > >> >> To unsubscribe, please visit > >> >> http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general > >> > > >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
