On 15:47 Thu 22 May , Ira Weiny wrote: > I guess my question is "does saquery need this to talk to the SA?" > > I am assuming the answer is "yes". > > I noticed this in the spec section 14.4.7 page 890: > > "The SM Key used for SM authentication is independent of the SM Key in the > SA header used for SA authentication." > > Does this mean there could be 2 SM_Key values in use?
At least I see nothing in the spec against this. Also there is stated explicitly that validity for non-zero values is vendor-defined. Sasha _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
