> Then we have a common approach for both nonSRQ and SRQ. We can remove > async event handler. I have tested above patches. But I would like to > hear your thoughts before sumitting them.
Seems like it would end up ignoring ordering rules for handling completions etc, and open windows for either leaking receive buffers or use-after-free. I don't know what the motivation is: what problems do we solve by doing this? _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
