On Sat, 2008-07-26 at 14:25 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: > > Then we have a common approach for both nonSRQ and SRQ. We can remove > > async event handler. I have tested above patches. But I would like to > > hear your thoughts before sumitting them. > > Seems like it would end up ignoring ordering rules for handling > completions etc, and open windows for either leaking receive buffers or > use-after-free. I don't know what the motivation is: what problems do > we solve by doing this?
The motivation was to release IPoIB QP resource on time especially for IPoIB nonSRQ with limited connections. I will post the patches for review to make sure there is no window for leaking receive buffers or use-after-free. Thanks Shirley _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
