On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 09:17:39 -0700 Al Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey Hal, > > On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 21:54 -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > Hi Al, > > > > On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 8:40 PM, Al Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Note that these scripts specify -R (reset only) for perfquery, so there > > > aren't any issues with multiple perfquery outputs that may need to be > > > parsed multiple times/differently. > > > > But this takes many more resets to work, right ? Why not have loop > > ports (for reset) only do this is all ports is not supported ? > > Do you mean remove the --loop_ports option and loop the ports by default > even if AllPortSelect isn't supported? > > I suppose that'd be fine. The reason I added an option was I just > didn't want to change default behavior. But if everyone is happy just > making it happen by default, I'm ok with that as well. >
I vote yes. Have the loop ports happen "under the covers" if the user specifies '-a' this includes summing the values just like AllPortSelect would in the switch. If the user specifies "0xff" I think that would be a good way to request specific functionality and (as per Al's other email) return an error if AllPortSelect is not supported. Ira _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
