On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Al Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey Sasha, Hal, all, > > Now I'm thinking this: > > if user specifies port 255 - they are expecting AllPortSelect. So error > out. > > if user specifies '-a' - Do whatever it takes to query/reset on all > ports. If it means looping do that. Aggregate counters appropriately > for a single output. > > if user specifies --loop-ports - loop through the ports one by one no > matter what. This includes outputting port counters for each port. > > Sound like a good idea?
Sounds good to me too. -- Hal > Al > > On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 21:39 +0200, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote: >> On 09:31 Thu 09 Oct , Al Chu wrote: >> > >> > I just re-read this sentence, now I get what you're asking. I made -- >> > loop_ports only loop if AllPortSelect isn't supported. So if the >> > switches already support AllPortSelect, the number of resets should be >> > the same. >> >> OTOH perfquery is diagnostic tool. Reset with AllPortSelect may not work >> as expected or an user may have another reason to loop over ports >> regardless to AllPortSelect support. >> >> Sasha > -- > Albert Chu > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Computer Scientist > High Performance Systems Division > Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory > > _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
