On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Sasha Khapyorsky <[email protected]> wrote: > On 15:58 Wed 04 Feb , Hal Rosenstock wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Sasha Khapyorsky <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On 07:57 Tue 03 Feb , Hal Rosenstock wrote: >> >> >> >> Patch to increase size of monitored node in >> >> osm_perfmgr.c::__collect_guids. Redirection table is indexed by actual >> >> port number. >> > >> > There are couple of validations like (port > p_mon_node->redir_tbl_size) >> > in osm_perfmgr.c. Would it be correct after proposed change? >> >> I see an issue with those tests which I will fix in a subsequent patch. > > Could you fix this and post v2?
I can. > - putting bugs in a main stream is bad > in general and practically also complicates things like bisecting. It was leaving an old bug in rather than adding a new one. -- Hal > Sasha > _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
