On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Hal Rosenstock <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Sasha Khapyorsky <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 15:58 Wed 04 Feb , Hal Rosenstock wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Sasha Khapyorsky <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > On 07:57 Tue 03 Feb , Hal Rosenstock wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Patch to increase size of monitored node in >>> >> osm_perfmgr.c::__collect_guids. Redirection table is indexed by actual >>> >> port number. >>> > >>> > There are couple of validations like (port > p_mon_node->redir_tbl_size) >>> > in osm_perfmgr.c. Would it be correct after proposed change? >>> >>> I see an issue with those tests which I will fix in a subsequent patch. >> >> Could you fix this and post v2? > > I can.
Would you push the latest changes you've accepted up to the management repo on the OFA server as they impact this ? -- Hal >> - putting bugs in a main stream is bad >> in general and practically also complicates things like bisecting. > > It was leaving an old bug in rather than adding a new one. > > -- Hal > >> Sasha >> > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general > > To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general > _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
