> The existing code (performing SET_PORT for Ethernet port) is not a > bug, bu it is unnecessary. It turns into a bug if patch 1/2 is > applied.
So if someone doing a bisection lands between 1/2 and 2/2 then mlx4 is broken? Can the order of patches be reversed so that we avoid having a broken intermediate state? Or should this just be one big patch? _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
