> That's max'd out so should be cleared to see if it is continually incrementing.
The number doesn't change after the subnet is up. >Get the portinfo on the SM peer port. Something like: >smpquery -D portinfo 0,1 >assuming you are doing this from the SM node. What if I am running it on a node other than SM node? I don't have tools to run on SM node now. > So different cables are in use ? Same HCA for OpenSM though ? The cables are all the same type. HCAs are all same as well. Thanks! Yicheng Jia Hal Rosenstock <[email protected]> 03/27/2009 04:55 PM To Yicheng Jia <[email protected]> cc [email protected], [email protected] Subject Re: [ofa-general] OpenSM initialization error On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Yicheng Jia <[email protected]> wrote: > > The "port_rcv_errors" attribute on OpenSM side of SM link is 65535, other > errors attributes are all 0. That's max'd out so should be cleared to see if it is continually incrementing. Port Rcv Errors are the following: • Local physical errors (ICRC, VCRC, LPCRC, and all physical errors that cause entry into the BAD PACKET or BAD PACKET DISCARD states of the packet receiver state machine) • Malformed data packet errors (LVer, length, VL) • Malformed link packet errors (operand, length, VL) • Packets discarded due to buffer overrun > How can I check SM link status on the switch side? Get the portinfo on the SM peer port. Something like: smpquery -D portinfo 0,1 assuming you are doing this from the SM node. > Is there anything I can do if the SM link port on the switch side is > not in init state? Let's see if that's the case first. > I don't think it's cable issue. I have 3 unmanaged switches on different > system, all have the same problem. So different cables are in use ? Same HCA for OpenSM though ? -- Hal > Thanks! > > Yicheng Jia > > > > > Hal Rosenstock <[email protected]> > > 03/27/2009 03:19 PM > > To > Yicheng Jia <[email protected]> > cc > [email protected], [email protected] > Subject > Re: [ofa-general] OpenSM initialization error > > > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Hal Rosenstock > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Yicheng Jia <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Yes. This persists for nearly 1 minute. >>> >>> One thing I notice is if I start mthca driver more than 1 minute before >>> OpenSM starts, then there's no such error message anymore, this is gone. >>> So >>> I guess there's some handshaking going on between mthca driver and >>> unmanaged >>> switch firmware, which stablize communication before OpenSM starts. Do >>> you >>> have any idea about it? >> >> The physical link is brought up all on its own assuming the ports are >> not disabled. Maybe the SM link being used is not in init yet. I don't >> think that is well handled. > > What do the port counters say on both sides of the SM link ? > > Maybe try different cables on the SM link and see if this gets better. > > -- Hal > >> -- Hal >> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Yicheng Jia >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Hal Rosenstock <[email protected]> >>> >>> 03/27/2009 03:02 PM >>> >>> To >>> Yicheng Jia <[email protected]> >>> cc >>> [email protected], [email protected] >>> Subject >>> Re: [ofa-general] OpenSM initialization error >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Yicheng Jia <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Here is the output of saquery. I am using Qlogic 9024 FC unmanaged >>>> switch. >>>> Only one SM exists in the subnet. >>> >>> <snip...> >>> >>> Is this topology simply one switch surrounded by HCAs ? If so, I don't >>> have a theory as to why this message persists for 1 second. >>> >>> -- Hal >>> >>> >>> _____________________________________________________________________________ >>> Scanned by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs. >>> For more information please visit >>> http://www.ers.ibm.com >>> >>> _____________________________________________________________________________ >>> >>> >>> >>> _____________________________________________________________________________ >>> Scanned by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs. >>> For more information please visit http://www.ers.ibm.com >>> >>> _____________________________________________________________________________ >>> >> > > _____________________________________________________________________________ > Scanned by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs. > For more information please visit http://www.ers.ibm.com > _____________________________________________________________________________ > > > _____________________________________________________________________________ > Scanned by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs. > For more information please visit http://www.ers.ibm.com > _____________________________________________________________________________ > _____________________________________________________________________________ Scanned by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs. For more information please visit http://www.ers.ibm.com _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ Scanned by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs. For more information please visit http://www.ers.ibm.com _____________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
