Roland Dreier wrote:
Having a sysfs file per connection is huge overhead, both in terms of the 
number of syscalls to read it, and also the pinned kernel memory just for the 
dentries etc.  I don't think it's a great idea.
Yes, I also think that the sysfs convention of one file per each piece of data is inappropriate for this case

Or.

_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

Reply via email to