Cool! Thanks for the info, Peter.
On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 21:08 +0200, Peter Neubauer wrote: > David, > > On 9/15/06, David Leangen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I can envision a few layers of abstraction. Obviously, on the first > > level, there is the bundle. This is already handled very well by the > > various implementations (KF, Felix...). Above that, is the GOB. I > > interpret the GOB as being a kind of super bundle, but can be thought of > > abstractly as simply a bundle. > Actually, > this came up as one of the more interesting points that came up on the > OSGi entreprise workshop last week, grouping of bundles into larger > nestable units. I think there was not much response on how to do that > in practice/spec though. Let's see if we have use cases and > possibilities to drive that. > > Another thing that got high votings was the "whole lifecycle > management of bundles", brought up on behalf of OPS4J work by me ;). > That is, development, testing, repository, discovery, runtime, > metadata etc etc. > > You can read more on that under > > http://www.osgi.org/blog/ > > /peter > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
