On Tuesday 06 February 2007 10:48, David Leangen wrote: > It would be _really_ nice to have the build framework set up some > kind of runtime environment for this.
Exactly, this is Run Configuration and need more work. > Another thing I was considering is during runtime, if the "deployment > mode" were set to "development", then at Bundle.start(), maybe some > kind of diagnostics/tests could be run as part of the cycle. Just a > thought. Hmmm... Would this be the same as having different "Run Profiles" which would assemble different set of bundles into the application? Or are we talking some AOP styled feature where deployment mode would weave in different aspects? > I don't see anything explicit about native libraries in there. I > assume you've not forgotten about those? Yes, I have forgotten about those. > And if the BundleDescriptor produces the pom, what about: > - pom hierarchy? > - plugins Edward caught this with me orally earlier. I suggested that "produce" is changed to "sync" or "update", so that one can has one's own content in the POM. When I wrote it, I noticed that many IDEs has their own build workflow, and then has a "generate Ant build" to support commandline builds. Not that great idea with Maven... Cheers Niclas _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
